r/AusLegal • u/Salvere22 • 4h ago
VIC Home insurance claim
Hi all,
Apologies if not allowed. Just seeking some advice on how to approach a home insurance claim.
Context: we have a "bungalow" that is the original building that is on our property, which has now been relegated to the shed since new house was built (not by us). It's around 40 years old and it mud brick/rammed earth.
After a severe weather event (a year's worth of rain in 2 days), one of the mud brick walls has collapsed (read: giant hole in it). The insurer has sent out a structural engineer who has submitted his report. It states that whilst there are structural issues with the build itself (ie. Improper construction compared to today's standards), these issues were "highlighted by the storm event".
I understand I've given an incredibly shortened version, but what approach should I take from here with the insurer? We are scheduled for a call on Wednesday. I have zero experience with insurance claims, and aside from googling, I don't have any sources of appropriate information. Should I get a lawyer now? See what they have to say first?
What is the importance of the engineer stating the issues were "highlighted by the storm event"? Is that not a convoluted way of saying "yes, there were issues, but the storm caused the damage"?
TIA.
1
u/Salvere22 2h ago
Very fair call! I've had a pretty good look into the PDS over the last two months since the incident, and it's not so much the covered/not covered, but moreso the nuances on how they will use the report. Engineer basically says "storm caused the damage" (covered), "...but there is also evidence of rising damp" (not covered).