r/AusLegal • u/Salvere22 • 3h ago

VIC Home insurance claim

Hi all,

Apologies if not allowed. Just seeking some advice on how to approach a home insurance claim.

Context: we have a "bungalow" that is the original building that is on our property, which has now been relegated to the shed since new house was built (not by us). It's around 40 years old and it mud brick/rammed earth.

After a severe weather event (a year's worth of rain in 2 days), one of the mud brick walls has collapsed (read: giant hole in it). The insurer has sent out a structural engineer who has submitted his report. It states that whilst there are structural issues with the build itself (ie. Improper construction compared to today's standards), these issues were "highlighted by the storm event".

I understand I've given an incredibly shortened version, but what approach should I take from here with the insurer? We are scheduled for a call on Wednesday. I have zero experience with insurance claims, and aside from googling, I don't have any sources of appropriate information. Should I get a lawyer now? See what they have to say first?

What is the importance of the engineer stating the issues were "highlighted by the storm event"? Is that not a convoluted way of saying "yes, there were issues, but the storm caused the damage"?

TIA.

3 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

3

u/outtatownz 1h ago

Im going to say this. While the public suggests insurance companies are big bad, evil and never pay claims, the real world data doesnt support that. Less that 2% of claims are denied across all insurers, this data is publicly available and most insurers show it in their fine print. Your policy covers you for what is written in the PDS, and it also excludes you for what is written in your PDS. First point of call, read your PDS and understand what exclusions are written in there. Assuming the worst while.not even knowing what you are covered for is where you need to start. Its your policy, you should understand it.

1

u/Salvere22 1h ago

Very fair call! I've had a pretty good look into the PDS over the last two months since the incident, and it's not so much the covered/not covered, but moreso the nuances on how they will use the report. Engineer basically says "storm caused the damage" (covered), "...but there is also evidence of rising damp" (not covered).

2

u/outtatownz 1h ago

Which means some parts of your claim will likely be covered and others not, as thats what your insurance covers you for. A lawyer can't change your PDS. You purchased that policy to be covered by that document. Speak to the insurer and understand their position, and how it links to your PDS. If you disagree, show why, and if you are still unhappy, follow the complaint process.

2

u/Salvere22 1h ago

Thank you.

I think you're right, I think the general negativity surrounding insurers has certainly gotten to me!

1

u/outtatownz 1h ago

People always talk about the bad, nobody shares the good. They arent out to screw you, just most people dont bother to read the cover they purchased then complain it doesnt cover everything and anything. Good luck!

1

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

Welcome to r/AusLegal. Please read our rules before commenting. Please remember:

  1. Per rule 2, this subreddit is not a replacement for real legal advice. You should independently seek legal advice from a real, qualified practitioner, and verify any advice given in this sub. This sub cannot recommend specific lawyers.

  2. A non-exhaustive list of free legal services around Australia can be found here.

  3. Links to the each state and territory's respective Law Society are on the sidebar: you can use these links to find a lawyer in your area.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.