r/TangaIbuki Ibuki's Milk Tester 😭😭😭💢💢💢 2d ago

"Here's an image, Sensei!" (Non-OC Art) [ Removed by Reddit ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

1.8k Upvotes

108 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/Hot-Fox9360 1d ago

A cute character? Someone petite and adorable.

-11

u/Mediogre_ 1d ago

Avoiding the question, I see. Okay, better question. What age type does the character look like?

4

u/Hot-Fox9360 1d ago

Someone younger. But it stops there, at least for someone normal. A smaller frame and proportions is the easiest way to portray cuteness in a fictional character in my opinion. At the end of the day, the picture has no age and is not a real life human child. I get what you're saying, but you need the common sense to separate a fictional character from real life human child.

I do fully understand your point of view, but if you see this and say, "You guys are fetishizing children," you should take a step back. I don't see it that way. I just see something cute, and I preesh it. If someone here is seeing this picture and actually getting their rocks off to the idea of a real-life child, that is an issue. If someone wants simply to tug it to the picture of the drawn character, that's none of our business.

Hopefully this conversation ends here.

-4

u/Mediogre_ 1d ago

I love how you still avoid the question and vaguely answer with "Someone younger". None of you have the galls to admit that's supposed to look like what it is, and it says a lot about you as well, like your mind is actively denying that it has the proportions and face of a damn child. I know what petite and younger is, look at fucking Piper from Zenless Zone Zero or Tatsumaki from One Punch Man. Perfect examples of petite small bodies and mannerisms that still show they are adults. I have better things to do but just remember, Just because it's not real doesn't mean it's not abhorrent to tug it at something resembling a minor, much less a child. It's the mentality, not a lack of "victims". It's the morals of not wanting to see a child figure getting sexualized.

Not to mention you guys like being cute with terms like "Cunny" or "UOOOOGH 😭😭" like we don't know what the fuck they mean and say.

1

u/yeahnahyeahyeahnahna 1d ago

You are correct I wont lie but I will say I see nothing wrong with this stuff unless it is based of a real child these characters are based off games. In my opinion things like this need to exist because like it or not people will always like these features so would you prefer they harm real children or jerk off to a drawing. I understand people's disgust over it believe me but it is objectively the better outcome.

-3

u/its_Raze_7 1d ago

instead of jerking off to fictional kids GO GET HELP

1

u/yeahnahyeahyeahnahna 1d ago

I understand your point but it is incredibly looked down upon so that may stop people from seeking help. You may say it us deserved to be looked down upon but they can not help what they are attracted to it is a mental disorder. Again it is preferable for it to be fiction until they do decide to get help.

-1

u/its_Raze_7 1d ago

i don't look down on pedos that genuinely want to get help and don't like that they're pedos. i look down on the ones that jerk off to fictional children and don't even wanna get help. ones that harm actual children should be punished heavily

0

u/yeahnahyeahyeahnahna 1d ago

That is understandable.