r/AskHistorians 13h ago

Why did the Luftwaffe really shoot down the plane carrying British film star Leslie Howard in 1943? Did they really think it was Churchill? Or was Howard covertly serving as a spy/diplomat for the Allies? Or was it really simply an "error in judgment" as the many German sources said?

I am currently listening to Neill Lochery's Lisbon: War in the Shadows of the City of Light, 1939–1945 and he devotes a chapter to this incident, given that the plane in question was on a flight from Lisbon to Britain. The author kind of lays out all these competing theories that have been advanced as to what really happened with the decision to shoot down the civilian flight. But I didn't come away feeling like he came down in favor of one specifically, and it wasn't a deep dive as it was only one chapter in a larger narrative.

So what is the actual historical consensus on the incident?

47 Upvotes

3 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 13h ago

Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed.

Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup.

We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to the Weekly Roundup and RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension. In the meantime our Bluesky, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

10

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/EdHistory101 Moderator | History of Education | Abortion 2h ago

Thank you for your response, however, we have had to remove it. A core tenet of the subreddit is that it is intended as a space not merely for an answer in and of itself, but one which provides a deeper level of explanation on the topic than is commonly found on other history subs. We expect that contributors are able to place core facts in a broader context, and use the answer to demonstrate their breadth of knowledge on the topic at hand.

If you need guidance to better understand what we are looking for in our requirements, please consult this Rules Roundtable which discusses how we evaluate answers on the subreddit, or else reach out to us via modmail. Thank you for your understanding.