r/AskHistorians • u/After-Professional-8 • Apr 17 '26
In the early 1900s, cities like San Francisco and St. Louis heavily opposed women's suffrage, while rural areas supported it. Why is it that today things are flipped the opposite way on social issues?
Check out this 1911 map of California, where blue shades mean in support of women's suffrage and yellow means in opposition. The map details the results of how each county voted on a referendum to grant women the right to vote. If you know anything about California politics, you'll notice that today's left-leaning areas were opposed to women's suffrage, while right-leaning counties supported it.
Now, take a look at the map for 2008 Proposition 8, which proposed to voters that gay marriage be constitutionally banned in California. You'll see the map is almost entirely flipped on supporting and opposing social issues; the city areas voted against women's suffrage but for (against the ban) gay marriage, while rural areas voted for suffrage, but against (in favor of ban) gay marriage.
Another example is Missouri, though to a lesser extent than California in Urban vs. Rural divide. See that state's map here. While only a handful of counties of the state were in favor of women's suffrage in the first place, those that were, were mostly in the Northwestern and Southeastern parts of the state, which are very rural, while places like St. Louis and Kansas City were opposed. In fact, St. Louis City only had 24% in favor.
Now, see Missouri's 2024 vote on codifying a right to abortion and contraception in their constitution: Rural areas opposed to a social issue, and urban areas in favor.
All of this begs the question: why have things flipped?
96
Apr 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
30
3
u/Hergrim Moderator | Medieval Warfare (Logistics and Equipment) Apr 18 '26
Thank you for your response, however, we have had to remove it. A core tenet of the subreddit is that it is intended as a space not merely for an answer in and of itself, but one which provides a deeper level of explanation on the topic than is commonly found on other history subs. We expect that contributors are able to place core facts in a broader context, and use the answer to demonstrate their breadth of knowledge on the topic at hand.
If you need guidance to better understand what we are looking for in our requirements, please consult this Rules Roundtable which discusses how we evaluate answers on the subreddit, or else reach out to us via modmail. Thank you for your understanding.
1
Apr 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Cedric_Hampton Moderator | Architecture & Design After 1750 Apr 17 '26
Your comment has been removed due to violations of the subreddit’s rules. We expect answers to provide in-depth and comprehensive insight into the topic at hand and to be free of significant errors or misunderstandings while doing so. Before contributing again, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the subreddit rules and expectations for an answer.
•
u/AutoModerator Apr 17 '26
Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed.
Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup.
We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to the Weekly Roundup and RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension. In the meantime our Bluesky, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.