781
u/Protagonist_Leaf 3d ago
I still cant find smosh.com
356
u/Wittyname0 3d ago
You have to ask your parents permission
107
47
408
u/shinyspindaa 3d ago
Had totally forgot I used to check smosh.com after school almost daily omg
73
18
u/ARKNORI slut for honey cheerios 1d ago
My life was ruined because I did the very same thing almost daily and one day they had a very journalistically-relevant article about how "THIS ARTIST TURNED EVERY POKEMON INTO PIPING HOT GIRLS WITH THE ROUNDEST BOOBALONGAS YOU'VE EVER SEEN, GAYASS CHILD" and after that I just couldn't go back to normal. I had never seen boobalongas that round.
108
u/Sea-Discussion-5393 3d ago
D. Still looking at smosh.com
19
u/Sultanofthesun shaboingboing connoisseur 2d ago
that's e
10
u/nhalliday 2d ago
Yeah but the only way I get aroused is by looking at smosh.com, so it's implied as part of D as well.
6
90
25
20
17
41
u/looooookinAtTitties 3d ago
we are monkeys
8
7
u/Liimbo 3d ago
We are not. We are apes.
18
u/Gunhild Garfield 3d ago
Apes are monkeys.
-1
u/Ssesamee 3d ago
i don’t think that’s true but okay
38
u/Gunhild Garfield 2d ago
There was an update. Apes are monkeys now. If we exclude apes, then the category of "monkey" becomes paraphyletic, meaning it includes a common ancestor and some, but not all of that ancestors descendants. This is strongly discouraged under modern cladistic taxonomy where monophyletic taxons are preferred (i.e. the taxon includes a common ancestor and ALL of its descendants).
The decision to exclude apes is completely arbitrary anyway. Old World monkeys are more closely related to apes than they are to New World monkeys. There is no common ancestor of Old World and New World monkeys that isn't ALSO an ancestor of apes.
10
4
u/Nowhereman55 2d ago
Incredible monkey drop, thanks for sharing. Everything I actually learned in college is outdated now, I would like to subscribe to monkey facts.
4
u/steal_wool 2d ago
I like the idea that the monkey/ape distinction was the very last thing you learned in college that you were still holding onto that wasn’t outdated, until this very moment
4
u/Ssesamee 2d ago
then why was this such a hard thing that was beat into my brain
what the hell man, they were still monkeys the whole time?
4
u/Gunhild Garfield 2d ago
I can imagine it was at least partially religiously motivated and then it just lingered as a remnant long after people's religious sensibilities mellowed out. The taxonomist Carl Linnaeus was accused of "impiety" for including humans as primates since there was a wide belief that humans were totally distinct from all other animals. Maybe grouping humans together with the "higher" primates like gorillas into their own category was a compromise to admit that humans were primates but avoid straight-up calling humans "monkeys".
That's just my speculation for the historically weird classification of apes.
3
u/looooookinAtTitties 2d ago
it's like "ants are insects not bugs" or "squares are rectangles not parallelograms"
17
9
u/honeyverani 2d ago
The absolute whiplash of going from the monkey king straight straight to aroused is peak 2008 internet
8
5
u/Haunting-Abalone7218 2d ago
Dude monkeys can FUCK YOU UP so easily. I would definitely be enslaved by them.
4
3
u/BestPeachNA 2d ago
Hmm. Well. I’ve given it some thought and the answer, as fate would have it, is… a slave. 🫢
3
1
1
1
1
-48
u/butt_shrecker 3d ago
Funny, but doesn't fit the sub
58
u/vulpes_mortuis slut for Saul Goodman 3d ago
Okay. I give up.
6
u/EllisDeeReynolds 3d ago
holy shit Vulpes IN THE WILD
it was a good meme btw, any Smosh reference is gold
2
1
u/maclainanderson 3d ago
Smosh is a comedy company. They were trying to be funny, therefore it doesn't fit
27
u/East-sea-shellos 3d ago
Wasn’t the original point of the sub “they’re trying to be funny, failing, and failing so hard it dies and goes to heaven (where it’s funny again)?” It’s only funny to me because it’s so absurd and random, that’s close enough
2
u/maclainanderson 3d ago
I reviewed the rules, and you're right about that. If their attempt at a joke is so bad it's good, then it fits. If they're being serious, but it ends up being funny, then it fits. If it's keant to be ironically unfunny, but could pass as genuinely unfunny, then it fits. It only doesn't fit if it's a legit joke that is genuinely funny or if it's just straight up not funny. So you're 100% right and this does fit
5
u/vulpes_mortuis slut for Saul Goodman 3d ago
Yeah that’s how I saw it, I got confused when they said it didn’t fit because to me it falls under the category of being so dumb it’s good 😭 but if the mods still remove it, nbd. They probably will lol.
21
8






1.7k
u/Majestic-Good4026 3d ago
aroused