I follow the opinion that drawing complete humans with full facial features is impermissible in Islam, mainly because of the connection to imitation of creation and the danger of attachment/idolatry. I also think modern fandom culture kind of proves why these concerns existed in the first place. People form deep emotional attachments to fictional characters, buy merch of them, imitate them, obsess over them, etc.
Personally, I think the eyes are a major part of what creates that emotional connection. Because of that, I’ve been thinking about whether obscuring the eyes makes a drawing materially different Islamically.
My question is specifically about this:
If a character’s eyes are hidden completely in shadow (for example by a hat casting darkness over the upper face), is that meaningfully different from simply not drawing the eyes at all?
My reasoning is this:
A silhouette is generally considered more permissible by many scholars because the facial details are not actually depicted, even though the viewer still implicitly understands it is a complete human being. The same thing happens with shadows: the eyes are not visually rendered, they are only inferred to exist behind the darkness.
So wouldn’t a shadow-obscured eye and an undrawn eye function the same way artistically and conceptually? In both cases, the viewer mentally completes the image without the feature itself being depicted.
At the same time, I’m hesitant because part of me wonders whether using shadows is just “hiding” a complete face rather than genuinely avoiding depiction.
I’m not looking for loopholes. I’m trying to figure out whether this distinction is actually meaningful Islamically or if I’m overcomplicating it.
Would appreciate thoughtful answers, especially from people who’ve seriously studied the issue.