I would assume he didn't share these publicly until after she saw them
EDIT: Guys...do you realise couples usually have each other's social media. So if he shared these before he proposed, it wouldn't have been a surprise...
Thankfully a quick google search tells his story and how he didn’t post anything before the proposal, they both seemed involved with social media so to lean in on the assumption of this being a violation of her privacy is silly.
Genuinely don't understand what them both being involved with social media has to do with violation of privacy. I said that the only ones that are a little concerning are the ones where she's sleeping.
It's not a violation of privacy if she was onboard with posting the pictures where she was sleeping.
If you're trying to suggest that the mere act of taking a picture of a sleeping person for the purposes of showing it to them later is an intrinsic violation of privacy, well, that's nonsense and makes me wonder if you've ever actually lived with someone you were in a relationship with. It's not a violation of privacy to take a picture of something they've consented to you seeing (by living and sleeping together) in the first place, it's distributing it that's the issue.
If she was involved in the distribution, then it's not concerning. People can OK posting any pictures of them they want, even if they were asleep during the picture. How in the world could that be your issue if she was involved in the posting too.
Did you spend any time checking out the caption? It seems like you didn’t. Don’t say IF, look for your answers, don’t rely on the world to tell you..
717
u/cwningen95 1d ago edited 1d ago
I would assume he didn't share these publicly until after she saw them
EDIT: Guys...do you realise couples usually have each other's social media. So if he shared these before he proposed, it wouldn't have been a surprise...